Gaps, open questions and honest tensions

Summary

Six items to build fresh, five questions the corpus raises and does not answer, five tensions to publish rather than resolve, and five loose ends worth an hour each. The questions are the substance: how connected a twin actually is once staleness is admitted, who may update a twin's definition, whether the discipline of reality survives simulation, whether the broker's concentration risk is acceptable, and when a twin is finished.

Key concepts

• Staleness — connected, and six days old
• The concentration fork — the corpus states the cost and does not decide
• Projections, not facts — the likely reconciliation nobody has written
• The stopping rule — when going deeper would change no decision

Key ideas

• One working twin and nine applications: the primitive is load-bearing across five sites and demonstrated once.
• Connected or not is the powerful claim and the oversimplified one.
• The broker inverts the estate's core property, on purpose, and publishing that as a decision is more honest than presenting the design unqualified.
• The best material arrived last and least verified.
• The coverage measure has never been run, and one number would change what the discipline page can claim.

On this site

Published in full as gaps and open questions, with the five tensions echoed on the disclosure page.

Read the document